Vatican’s Holocaust


Ante’ Pavilec greets Cardinal Alois (Alojzije) Stepinac

“Blessed” Alojzije (Aloysius) Viktor Cardinal Stepinac (May 8, 1898February 10, 1960) was a Croatian Catholic Prelate. He was Archbishop of Zagreb from 1937 to 1960. In 1946, in a verdict that polarised public opinion both in Yugoslavia and beyond, a Belgrade court found him guilty of collaborating with the Ustaše and complicity in allowing the forced conversion of Orthodox Serbs to Catholicism. He was sentenced to 16 years in prison, but after five years was released and confined to his home parish of Krašić. He was appointed a Cardinal in 1952 by Pope Pius XII. In 1998 Pope John Paul II declared him a martyr and beatified him, which again polarised public opinion.

Ante Pavelić (July 14, 1889December 28, 1959) was the Head (Poglavnik) and founding member of the Croatian fascist Ustaše movement in the 1930s and later the leader of the Independent State of Croatia, a puppet state[1] [2] of Nazi Germany during World War II.

(More United States/Vatican Cover-up)

This is a page from a 1946 US Intelligence report on the Ustasha. Note that the Ustasha had already moved much of their loot to Rome by 1946. The Vatican through Dominic Mandic, Chief Economist and General Definitor of the Franciscan Order was providing financial means to the Ustasha. John Loftus who has researched these issues for well over a decade has written, Dominik Mandic controlled San Girolamos the ratline finances. Mandic arranged the laundering of Ustasha loot likely via the Franciscans Vatican Bank accounts to which he had access and placed the Franciscan printing presses at the disposal of the Ustasha to print false identity information for war criminals. -Unholy Trinity, page 118- Today the Franciscans deny their Nazi past.

Franciscan Treasurer Mandic provided scholarships so that Ustasha thugs and war criminals could freely transit between Spain in Rome in order to pursue their studies. Again the Franciscan OFM denies all knowledge.

Copy of Declassified CIA Report on Ustasha mass murderer hiding in safe-house provided by Franciscan Order in Rome

The Jesuits, in control of Adolph Hitler’s Roman Catholic Third Reich installed puppet dictators throughout Europe. They were:

* Bavarian Germany and the Third Reich – [Adolph] Hitler [born-died: 1889-1945]
* Italy – [Benito] Mussolini [born-died: 1883-1945]
* ‘Vichy’ France – [Henri Philippe] Petain [born-died: 1856-1951]
* Spain – [Francisco] Franco
* Austria – Seyss-Inquart and Cardinal Initzer
* Poland – Frank
* Slovakia – [Jesuit] Priest Tiso
* Croatia – [Ante] Pavelic
* Belgium – Degrelle.

Also in Palestine there was the Grand Mufti Husseini

Here is an excellent webpage for further study on this matter.
And HERE is yet another one The Vatican’s Holocaust, The sensational account of the most horrifying religious massacre of the 20th century. By Avro Manhattan

Convert or Die: Catholic Persecution in Yugoslavia During World War II Edmond Paris

The Yugoslav Auschwitz and the Vatican Vladimir Dedijer Witness to Jasenovacs Hell Ilija Ivanovic





Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting


The Catholic Ustasha assassinated the king of Yugoslavia, King Alexander I who was against the Roman unholy alliance. Then they stepped up their take over. When they Assassinated King Alexander I they also killed the French foreign minister and Engelbert Dollfuss, Chancellor of Austria. Ultimately this lead to mass murder inquisition under Pope Pius and the Black Pope, Jesuit General Wlodimar Ledochowski who died in 1942 and was suceeded by Jean Baptiste Janssens.

Austria's Dolfus French Foreign Minister Barthou King Alexander and Barthou right before assassination

Above pics from left to right. Dollfus of Austria, Barthou of France,
and King Alexander I and Barthou right before their assassination.

Ante’ Pavelic, the bloody dictator of Croatia and the Archbishop of Zagreb Cardinal Stepinac oversaw probably the most cruelest genocide in human history. 840,000 people murdered because they weren’t Roman Catholics.

Jasenovac concentration camp (in Croatian: Logor Jasenovac in Serbian: Логор Јасеновац / Logor Jasenovac) was the largest concentration and extermination camp in Croatia during World War II. It was established by the Ustaša (Ustasha) regime of the Independent State of Croatia in August 1941. It was dismantled in April 1945.

Unlike other concentration and extermination camps, in Jasenovac the main victims were ethnic Serbs, whom Ante Pavelić considered the main racial enemy of NDH, although other groups, like Jews, Gypsies, and even Croats were also the victims there.

Jasenovac was a complex of five subcamps and three smaller camps spread out over 240 square kilometers (93 square miles), in relatively close proximity to each other, on the bank of the Sava river. Most of the camp was at Jasenovac, about 100 km (62 miles) southeast of Zagreb. The complex also included large grounds at Donja Gradina directly across the Sava river, a camp for children in Sisak to the northwest, and a women’s camp in Stara Gradiška to the southeast.

Map of Jasenovac from 1942
(Click image to show full size)

Video: Vatican Control through Civil Law Ex Priest breaks down how the Catholic Church attains power in many nations through their civil law system.

If you don’t think this is coming here to America you’re deceived. It’s all set-up and no-one will escape. You have to decide what you will do with your eternal soul. Jesus promises eternal life for those who serve Him and refuse the Mark of the Beast and the things this beast system offers.

Rev 13:15-17 “And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.”

And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Friar Miroslav Filipović AKA “Father Satan”

Here pictures of Monks and Jesuit priests who doubled as the cut-throat Ustasha. (or spelled Ustashe, Ustasa, )

Here’s one of a Austrian Nazi Jesuit double agent:Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Probably around the same year Arnold Schwarzenegger’s
Father was in Austria’s Pro Nazi Fascist Military

Another Pro Fascist Pro Nazi Cardinal Below:
Austria’s Theodor Cardinal Innitzer
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Ante Pavelić (July 14, 1889December 28, 1959) was the Head (Poglavnik) and founding member of the Croatian fascist Ustaše movement in the 1930s and later the leader of the Independent State of Croatia, a puppet state[1] [2] of Nazi Germany during World War II

More Pictures:

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Here, he’s facing Cardinal Stepinac who was arrested for War crimes and went
to jail and died under house arrest and was beautified by the Pope in 1998.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Pavelic in the middle.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Pavelic (front right) and Cardinal Stepinac in the Back swearing in a Ustash catholic school.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Ante’ Pavelic with nuns

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

nuns marching with the vicious Ustasha

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Pavelic with Monks

Ante Pavelic with Italy’s Mussolini

Forced Catholic conversions below:

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

The Animals Loved Taking Pictures of Their Murders

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Concentration camp that Cardinal Stepinac oversaw

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

the Pope praying next to glass encased war criminal Cardinal Stepinac
at the time he Beautified this MONSTER.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Memorials and even this ArchBishop Stepinac High School in White Plains NY named after this Filthy war criminal.

Alex Jones always talks about the Reichstag yet purposely leaves out the rest.
Like the concordat between the Vatican and Germnay, Italy and Spain,
Yugoslavia and several other enemies of the “Allied Powers’ which is
another set up and a continuation of propaganda and manipulation of the world.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Purging Russia From the Evil Rothschild Money Changers


“War is the continuation of politics by other means.”  Carl von Clausewitz (Prussian general and military theorist)

We can further deduce from the above Von Clausewitz quote that politics is a continuation of economics by other means. Therefore, it could be argued that war is always a continuation of economics by other means.

Now, let us briefly examine the current situation in Russia. President Putin has been under heavy pressure from outside and inside: Western sanctions and intended oil price crash. Despite efforts by the Rothschild-controlled Central Bank of Russia (hereafter referred to as CBR) and the use of dozens of billions of foreign exchange reserves –   the value of the ruble against the dollar has, therefore ,declined by 39% during the past few years.

There has been much speculation that President Putin may soon nationalize the CBR and the ruble according to his senior advisor and chairman of the Russian parliament’s economic policy committee Yevgeny Fyodorov  in order to raise money for Russia’s now necessary armament projects in what appears as an imposed war on Russia by Washington and NATO.

Under the Constitution, the CBR belongs to a foreign State – the City of London – and is taking orders from London and Washington’s controlled IMF. CBR can only print money corresponding to its cash in foreign currency, that being the dollar, which is not sufficient for Russia’s purposes. The CBR even has to buy the worthless US treasury bonds for the dollars paid for Russian oil – whereby the dollars are returned to the Federal Reserve Bank. This is one of the biggest heists of all time!

Moreover, President Putin is under pressure from the West, which wants to overthrow and replace him with Western-minded puppet oligarchs. Thus, the US ambassador to Moscow, John F.Tefft, is said to have made it very clear in this statement: “We will displace Putin from office and install our own people as leaders of the Russian government.” It was reported that Tefft even mentioned the appointed ministers by name! Therefore, it has now become logical [and necessary] for President Putin to enhance the Russian military and strengthen the already existing alliance with the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization) to prevent Russia’s submission to Washington and NATO’s will. Sadly, it has come to this.

Yevgeny Fyodorov said in an interview that a split in the Russian elite has taken place in the last couple of years, as part of the elite have decided to stay with President Putin who then made his decision which defines the events to follow. Furthermore, the logic of:

1) A state of emergency, or

2) A geopolitical war entered into force, while Russia feels under pressure.

What this means is:

1) Washington cannot [and will not] diminish its pressure especially if the war-monger Hillary Clinton is installed into office, while

2) The pressure on Russia forces it to technologically evolve into a national liberation movement. For example, for many years, Russia could not obtain de-offshoring technology, but thanks to the pressures from Washington’s sanctions, Russia is now well into domesticating this task.

So what’s next? President Putin must now methodically clean the 5th column. That means the West-toxified liberals in the CBR, the Ministry of Finance, and the Ministry of Economy.

But above all, President Putin sees the West as the big speculator against the ruble. To put the plan straightforward:

1) A split in the government,

2) Identification of the 5th column in various branches of the government,

3) Identification of the 5th column in the media,

4) A parallel and active position on the Ukraine, because Ukraine and Russia’s ships must sail in the same direction for the good of all.

Nationalization of the CBR would be the first signal and the means to implement the final breach with the Rothschild’s City of London gangsters and its implementation arm, Washington. This Relationship has been tense since President Putin’s seizure of the Rothschild/ Chodorkowsky’s Yukos shares. Therefore, President Putin hesitates with the nationalization. He also still needs authorization to enforce his plan as the president of the Russian Federation. For this, he needs a “great necessity” which is apparently imminent because of Washington’s aggressions via the NATO.

Returning from the 2014 G20 meeting in Brisbane, President Putin said, “US wants to subdue Russia, but no one has ever done or would ever do.” It appears that this statement has a much deeper, existential dimension – not only for Russia, but for the entire world!

Moscow Times has been quoted by stating that President Putin has been under tremendous internal and external pressure to the extent that he must become “another Stalin“ in order for him and for  Russia to survive the Western isolation efforts and the economic war currently waged on Russia.  This means a final (staged) breach with the Rothschilds crime syndicate via Washington– after the first schism due to the  by President Putin.

It is now evident that the CBR is Rothschild’s pincers on Russia and on President Putin’s leadership per se. CBR is a member of Rothschild’s BIS (Bank of International Settlements) which is the central bank of central banks located in Basel, Switzerland – of course.

The Rothschild banking power structure controls the CBR via the US Federal Reserve Bank, i.e. making the CBR unable to print more rubles than corresponding to its supply of foreign exchange. Russia sells oil for dollars. For the dollars, Russia buys US bonds, whereby the dollars return to the US Fed. This in really is theft! As such, the Fed is squeezing the Russian economy in a grand game of vice and illusion.

Russia’s monetary policy has until now been jointly determined by the Fed and the People’s Bank of China (PBC). This means that CBR has never really been in control of neither the ruble nor am independent Russian monetary policy. CBR can only defend against these entities by limiting its foreign exchange reserves, which are finite.

In spite of Yevgeny Fyodorov’s statement of nationalization of the private CBR, President Putin is cautiously reluctant to interfere with Rothschild’s CBR grip on Russia – at least for the time being.

CBR’s CEO Elvira Nabiullina, 49, has served as the country’s Minister of Economic Development and Trade since September, 2007 before becoming Vladimir Putin’s aide in May 2012. Now President Putin demands the impossible from her: to stop the decline of the ruble.

Ever emboldened by its totally illegal regime change policies in Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, etc., Washington and its allies are now foolishly pursuing the same in Russia. Mikhail Fradkov, the head of the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), warned that Moscow is aware of US’s moves to oust President Putin from power. The ruble has lost approximately 40% of its value against the dollar in the past several years. (Business Insider, May 2, 2016). Nevertheless, President Putin still feels under heavy pressure from the West, as the West seems to stop at nothing.

 Vladimir Putin wants to take action against ruble speculators:  “External enemies” would try “to force Russia to her knees. We have asked the central bank to take measures to ensure that the speculators cannot benefit anymore,” the Financial Times quoted the Russian President as saying. “We know who these people are.” He classifies the entire West to be the author of anti-Russian actions. “It’s been that way for centuries.”

Russia Insider quoted President Putin on Dec. 5 2015 as saying, “Those whom we considered our friends from across the pond, they would gladly let Russia follow the Yugoslav scenario of disintegration. It did not work. Just as it did not work for Hitler, who set out to destroy Russia and push us back beyond the Urals. Everyone should remember how that ended.”

“No one will ever attain military superiority over Russia. We have a modern and combat ready army, a formidable army. We have the strength, will and courage to protect our freedom. Some governments attempt to create a new iron curtain around Russia” (The Grand Chessboard).

In my opinion what we are seeing is a big “coming out”. It is painfully clear that Russia considers Washington to be an arrogant bully whom Russia can stop and that Russia considers the regimes in power in the EU as voiceless colonies. Washington is too arrogant and the Europeans are too spineless.

The Kremlin has given up any hope of achieving anything through any kind of dialog.

From now on, Russia will mostly rely on unilateral actions. These actions will always come as a shock and a surprise to the Western plutocracies. This will be a long cold war and it will only end when one of the two sides basically breaks down and collapses. Now Russia is preparing for war, but she does not want this war; it is being imposed on her!

CNN Money reported on Dec. 3 2015:  Yevgeny Fyodorov, a senior member of President Vladimir Putin’s party and chairman of the Russian parliament’s economic policy committee, accused the central bank of sabotage, telling local media that it was “an institutional enemy of the country.”

The bank is now being investigated by state prosecutors as a result. The bank’s biggest crime is failing to prevent the ruble from plunging – despite spending tens of billions of foreign currency reserves trying to prop it up.

Western sanctions froze investment and raised funding costs. The crisis has sparked a flight of capital — some $150 billion is expected to leave the country this year. Another $80 billion could follow in 2017.

Russia has been taking another big knock from the sharp fall in oil prices in the past few years. Revenues from oil and gas make up nearly half the Russian state budget. As revenues fall, the currency weakens further. This drives up inflation, forcing the CBR to jack up interest rates, exacerbating thereby depressing activity.

But Yevgeny Fyodorov has more to reveal: Wiki Spooks 3 Sept. 2015: He cited the unrelenting aggressive posture and actions by the West as having reached a stage where some in the Kremlin and other state institutions who decline to demonstrate appropriate national loyalty will have to be purged from leadership positions – the alternative being capitulation to the West.

“Our Central Bank, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Economics, are driving us along the road to destruction of the Russian economy, because they are executing the orders of Washington and London”, Yevgeny Fyodorov has said.

Russia needs to return to a classical economy, nationalization of the ruble, discontinue the practice of currency reserves, and conduct accelerated de-off-shoring. That means freezing the assets of those who do not want to de-offshore which means all of the major foreign-owned businesses [of the foe nations] in Russia, Sadly, it has come to that.

Next, it’s just a question of when President Putin will get the revolutionary authority for a purge. That is a power that he currently does not have. We’re talking about an act directly contradicting the Constitution.  This is something that will have to be legalized under legislation which will be passed by the Duma, giving President Putin special powers. Or else, there could be a referendum, in which the people give him those powers if they chose so. But it has to be done and it has to be done soon.

We recognize that the purge will begin. It doesn’t involve ejecting people. This purge does not intend to remove Alexey Simanovsky (left – Central Bank First Deputy Chairman) from the CBR. However, he will be chased out with sticks when he severely damages the interests of the Russian population and the Russian economy.

Again, US Ambassador in Russia John Tefft has clearly stated, “We’re going to force out Putin and appoint our people as the leader of the government and the ministers”. This was the scenario in Kiev.”

President Putin gathered the deputies in Yalta and looked each of them in the eye to ensure they wouldn’t get cold feet. And being thus strengthened, President Putin’s decision pre-determines the subsequent events.

Next, the Americans attempted to break the situation using the Boeing incident – but failed. On the contrary, the Russian national path began to strengthen. At this point, it was clear to all, that:

1) Either President Putin had to go to the Hague where the Americans would have conducted a forceful trial, leading to the destruction of Russia and the further disempowerment of the Russian population,

2) Or else, there will form a system of resistance to the actual foreign invasion. A dynamic has now begun, which pushes President Putin in that direction:

a) The purge,

b) Building a national economy

c) Re-industrialization.

This brings us back to CBR which won’t allow the money to be lent to President Putin’s above-stated three objectives. As soon as the CBR and the ruble are nationalized, entrepreneurs can be granted business savvy loans.

As stated earlier, under the Constitution, CBR (for all practical purposes) works for a foreign state, i.e. Federal Reserve, City of London, and other Rothschild entities.

With those words, President Putin has defined his position and Russia’s strategy. It will all begin with certain mechanisms like nationalization of the CBR due to a necessity that doesn’t have to be far off because Washington is charging with frightful force. The Americans are not going to save anyone.  They only need oligarchs while Russia is a formidable challenge for them which they intend to solve by dissolution of the state – Yugoslavia styled. After that, it has now become crystal clear that Washington fully intends to construct an absolutely brutal, not just colonial, but an enslaved world!

Putin: Nyet to Neo-liberals, Da to National Development

After more than two years of worsening economic growth and an economy struggling with 10.5% central bank interest rates that make new credit to spur growth virtually impossible, Russian President Vladimir Putin has finally broken an internal factional standoff. On July 25 he mandated that an economic group called the Stolypin Club prepare their proposals to spur growth revival to be presented to the government by the Fourth Quarter of this year. In doing so, Putin has rejected two influential liberal or neo-liberal economic factions that had brought Russia into a politically and economically dangerous recession with their liberal Western free market ideology. This is a major development, one I had been expecting since I had the possibility to exchange views this June in St. Petersburg at the annual St. Petersburg International Economic Forum.

With very little fanfare, Russian press a few days ago carried a note that could have a most profound positive significance for the future of the Russian domestic economy. The online Russian blog, Katheon, carried the following short notice: “Russian President Vladimir Putin instructed (the Stolypin economist group–w.e.) to finalize the report of the Stolypin Club and on its basis to prepare a new program of economic development, alternative to Kudrin’s economic plan. The program itself should be given to the Bureau of Economic Council in the IV quarter of 2016.”

In their comment, Katheon notes the major significance of the decision to drop the clearly destructive neo-liberal or free market approach of former Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin: “The Stolypin club report advises to increase the investment, pumping up the economy with money from the state budget and by the issue of the Bank of Russia. In turn, the concept of the Center for Strategic Research (Alexei Kudrin) suggested that investments should be private and the state is to ensure macroeconomic stability, low inflation, reduced budget deficit.”

Kudrin failed

In the current situation of severe Western economic and financial sanctions against Russia the flows of such private investment into the economy as the Kudrin camp advocates are rare, to put it gently. Cutting what is a very minimal budget deficit only increases unemployment and worsens the situation. President Putin has clearly realized that that neo-liberal “experiment” has failed. More likely, is that he was forced to let economic reality unfold under the domination of the liberals to the point it was clear to all internal factions that another road was urgently needed. Russia, like every country, has opposing vested interests and now clearly the neo-liberal bested interests are sufficiently discredited by the poor performance of the Kudrin group that the President is able to move decisively. In either case, the development around the Stolypin Group is very positive for Russia.

In convening the new meeting of the Economic Council Presidium on May 25, after a hiatus of two years, President Putin, noting that the group deliberately consisted of opposing views, at that time stated, “I propose today that we start with the growth sources for Russia’s economy over the next decade…The current dynamic shows us that the reserves and resources that served as driving forces for our economy at the start of the 2000’s no longer produce the effects they used to. I have said in the past, and want to stress this point again now, economic growth does not get underway again all on its own. If we do not find new growth sources, we will see GDP growth of around zero, and then our possibilities in the social sector, national defense and security, and in other areas, will be considerably lower than what is needed for us to really develop the country and make progress. “

Now just two months later, Putin obviously has decided. He clearly has an eye as well to Russia’s next presidential elections in March 2018. In doing so he has selected the one group of the three on the Economic Council that believes that the state has a positive role to play in development of the national economy.

The Stolypin group in many ways harkens back to the genius behind the German “economic miracle” after 1871, whose ideas created the most impressive economic growth from backwardness in all Europe within just over three decades. The only other countries to come near to that German economic achievement were the United States after 1865, and the Peoples’ Republic of China after 1979, with the Deng Xiaoping “Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.” The national economic development model is based on the work of the now-all-but-unknown 19th Century German national economist, Friederich List, the developer of the basic model of national economic development.

Three Camps

During the Shock Therapy years of Boris Yeltsin in the 1990’s, Harvard economists like Jeffrey Sachs, financed by meta-plunderer George Soros, advised Yeltsin. The disastrous policies of Yeltsin’s economic team, then led by Yegor Gaidar, implemented wholesale privatization of state assets at dirt-cheap prices to Western investors like Soros. They made drastic state budget reduction, cuts in living standards, elimination of old age pensions of the population. All was done in the name of “free market reform.” After that trauma, beginning with Putin’s first Presidency in 1999 Russia slowly began a painful recovery not because of the Gaidar-Harvard shock therapy, but rather despite it, a tribute to the determination of the Russian people.

As astonishing as it might seem, those free market ideologues, followers of the late Gaidar, until now have held a virtual monopoly over policies of the Economics and Finance Ministries of Russia.

They have been aided by the leader of a slightly different but equally destructive monetarist camp, Central Bank of Russia Governor Elvira Nabiullina who only seems obsessed with controlling inflation and stabilizing the Ruble.

This past May Putin gave the first sign that he was open to the idea that the ever-reassuring reports of his finance and economic ministers about how “recovery is just around the corner” (as Herbert Hoover allegedly said at onset of America’s Great Depression in 1930) were not right. The Russian President convened the Presidium of the Economic Council, a group which had not met in two years, charging them to come up with a plan to solve Russia’s economic problems. The Presidium consisted of thirty five members representing each of the three major economic camps.

Former neo-liberal Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin headed one camp backed by Finance Minister Anton Siluanov and Economic Minister Alexey Ilyukayev. This group demands the usual Western laissez-faire remedies such as drastic reduction of the role of the state in the economy via wholesale privatization of the railways, energy companies like Gazprom, and other valuable assets. Kudrin was also named by Putin to chair the newly-reorganized twenty-five-member economic strategy group in May. Many national economists feared the worst at his naming, namely a revival of Gaidar shock therapy, Mach II. That now will clearly not happen. Kudrin and his approach have been rejected as not effective.

The second group was represented by central bank head, Elvira Nabiullina. They were the most conservative, claiming that no reforms were needed and that no economic stimulus was needed either. Just hold a steady course under double-digit central bank interest rates and that will somehow kill inflation and stabilize the Ruble, as if that was the key to open the economic growth potential of Russia. It has instead been the key to slowly kill the economy and increase inflation.

Stolypin Group

The third group represented was the one most Western observers ridiculed and dismissed, with the US Pentagon-linked Stratfor referring to them as a “strange collective.” I have personally met and talked with them and they are hardly strange to anyone with a clear moral mind.

This is the group which after two months has emerged with the mandate from Vladimir Putin to lay out their plans to boost growth again in Russia.

The group is in essence followers of what the great almost-forgotten 19th Century German economist, Friedrich List, would call “national economy” strategies. List’s national economy historical-based approach was in direct counter-position to the then-dominant British Adam Smith free trade school.

List’s views were increasingly integrated into the German Reich economic strategy beginning under the Zollverein or German Customs Union in 1834, that unified one German internal domestic market. It created the basis by the 1870’s for the most colossal emergence of Germany as an economic rival exceeding Great Britain in every area by 1914.

This third group, the Stolypin group in the May, 2016 meeting, included Sergei Glazyev, and Boris Titov, co-chair of Business Russia, and Russia’s “business ombudsmen” since the creation of that post in 2012. Both Titov and Glazyev, an adviser to Putin on Ukraine and other matters, are founding members of the Stolypin Club in Russia. In 2012 Glazyev was named by Putin, then Prime Minister, to coordinate the work of federal agencies in developing the Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia, today the Eurasian Economic Union. Titov, also the Leader of Right Cause party, is a successful Russian entrepreneur who in recent years has turned to work advancing various economic policies within the state, often in vocal opposition to Kurdin’s free-market liberal ideas. Notably, Titov is also co-chairman of the Russian-Chinese Business Council.

A broad indication of the kind of proposals the Stolypin group will propose to revive substantial economic growth in Russia and deal with major basic infrastructure deficits that greatly hinder productive enterprise came in a series of proposals Glazyev made in September 2015 to the Russian Security Council, a key advisory body to the President.

There, Glazyev proposed a five-year ‘road map’ to Russia’s economic sovereignty and long-term growth. It was aimed toward building up the country’s immunity to external shocks and foreign influence, and ultimately, toward bringing Russia out of the periphery and into the core of the global economic system. Goals included raising industrial output by 30-35 percent over a five year period, creating a socially-oriented ‘knowledge economy’ via the transfer of substantial economic resources to education, health care and the social sphere, the creation of instruments aimed at increasing savings as a percent of GDP, and other initiatives, including a transition to a sovereign monetary policy.

In 1990 the first priority of Washington and the IMF was to pressure Yeltsin and the Duma to “privatize” the State Bank of Russia, under a Constitutional amendment that mandated the new Central Bank of Russia, like the Federal Reserve or European Central Bank, be a purely monetarist entity whose only mandate is to control inflation and stabilize the Ruble. In effect money creation in Russia was removed from state sovereignty and tied to the US dollar.

Glazyev’s 2015 plan also proposed to use Central Bank resources to provide targeted lending for businesses and industries by providing them with low subsidized interest rates, between 1-4 percent, made possible by quantitative easing to the tune of 20 trillion rubles over a five year period. The program also suggested that the state support private business through the creation of “reciprocal obligations” for the purchase of products and services at agreed-upon prices. As well Glazyev proposed that the Ruble build up its strength as an alternative to the de facto bankrupt dollar system by buying gold as currency backing. He proposed that the Central Bank be mandated to buy all gold production of Russian mines at a given price, in order to increase the ruble gold backing. Russia today is the world’s second largest gold producer.

Obviously Russia’s President has realized that whatever impressive advances Russia makes in the foreign policy area can be fatally undercut by a failing economy, Russia’s Achilles Heel as I noted in an earlier piece. The July 25 announcement by Putin has the potential to reverse that if done with resolution on all levels. There the President has a responsibility to clearly lay out their strategy over the coming five years—by the way a very useful time frame to judge results having nothing to do with old Soviet five-year plans, as France’s De Gaulle understood as well. By giving the population a clear vision of their future, he can tap into the remarkable Russian human resources to literally accomplish the impossible in turning the economy into a genuine prosperity based on sounder foundations than that of the monetarist laissez faire West which today is de facto bankrupt. Bravo Russia!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Vatican against the Orthodox Church

The Vatican against the Orthodox Church

Excerpted from the book:

Vatican Imperialism in the 20th Century

by Avro Manhattan.

GIANTS ACT LIKE GIANTS, hence their undertakings are on a gigantic scale. Years are reckoned by decades, decades by centuries. Geographical areas are made to embrace nations or even continents, while the histories of institutions and of races are seen in perspectives not easily comprehended. Because of this, their actions, being in harmony with their extraordinary magnitude, will escape the notice of individuals unable to size up the vast historical panoramas which, although clearly scrutinizable by retinas of gigantic forms, yet are partly blurred and often wholly invisible to others.

The Catholic Church, the greatest surviving giant in the world, is a colossus with no peer in antiquity, experience and above all, in her determination to dominate the human race. To reach such a goal, she will suffer no rivals, tolerate no competitors, put up with no enemies.

Giants who, like her, were found roaming in the deep valley of history, she fought with bloody claws and a ruthlessness to shame the Attillas, the Genghis Khans and all the other scourgers of civilization. Many she led to their destruction; others she subjugated for good; some were annihilated, but some resisted and escaped all her guiles. More than one survived, and even fought relentless battles that echoed with sanguinary echoes in the corridors of the centuries and that are still being fought as ferociously as in olden times, now, in the very midst of the twentieth century.

Vatican diplomacy is the oldest diplomacy in the world. Most of those it fought were either shrunk to nothing by time or blotted out by history, and to modern ears all its multifarious intrigues would sound as hollow and as unreal as they have become strangely unrelated to the ever-bewildering events of our day.

Yet not all the ancient foes of the Vatican have been reduced to mere landmarks of the past. Some have bridged bygone centuries to the present, and one of them, the most formidable of all, the Orthodox Church, a peer to Catholicism in antiquity, is as much a reality in our time as is the Vatican itself.

The antagonism of these two ancient colossi has produced the longest diplomatic war in the history of man, which is still being fought as fiercely, as ruthlessly and as unscrupulously as ever. Catholic intrigues against Orthodoxy, since its inception, are uncountable. They fill the annals of the first millennium; and from the beginning of the second, when in 1054 the Orthodox Patriarch, Michael Cerulanius, brought about the final breach between the Eastern and Western Churches, until the fall of Constantinople, they remained paramount in the history of medieval Europe.

The goal of this thousand-year war is simple: the destruction or subjugation of the Orthodox Church or its voluntary or forcible integration into the Catholic Church. The unscrupulousness of Vatican diplomacy to reach this objective, prior to and after the fall of Byzantium, is hardly matched by parallel exertions in history, its most blatant intrigues of the period being veritable masterpieces of diplomatic cunning and double-dealing. Councils, religious compromises, political bargaining, secret negotiations with Orthodox patriarchs, pacts with the Byzantine emperors – everything and every device was used at one time or another to put Orthodoxy in fetters. We can mention the pact struck with the last Orthodox emperor of Constantinople, who, to obtain a promise of help in the defense of the Orthodox capital against the gathering Mohammedan armies, pledged to the Vatican the mass conversion of the Orthodox Church.

From the smashing of the Orthodox Church’s political pillar, the Byzantine empire, in 1453, to the crumbling of its political successor, the Russian Czarist Empire, in 1917, the Vatican-Orthodox relations were characterized by a period of comparative diplomatic lull. This was due to historical factors, the most outstanding of which was that, in the course of the centuries, the center of Orthodoxy had shifted en masse from the Near East to the West, where its former missionary lands became its new home – namely, to Holy Russia. There the Orthodox Church struck deep roots. More than that: as Rome had been the first Rome, Constantinople had been the “second Rome,” so now Moscow became the “third Rome.” Moscow, Philothey said in the fifteenth century, was the natural successor of Constantinople. Now that Constantinople had fallen, the only Orthodox empire left in the world was the Russian. The Russian nation alone, therefore, henceforward became the true repository of the Orthodox faith. The idea of an Orthodox empire became the Russian’s paramount idea. Church and State were integrated, linked by a common messianic purpose. Having found such fertile soil, soon the Orthodox Church regained its old vigor and splendor. As of old, committing its ancient mistake, it identified itself as intimately with the Russian empire as it had previously done with the Byzantine. From about 1721, when Peter the Great, after his Spiritual Regulation, made the Orthodox Church a branch of Czarism, until the Bolshevik Revolution, Caesaro-popism made her invincible against the machinations of the Vatican and almost impregnable to its attack on the religious, diplomatic and political fronts. Her immense strength, however, was her fatal weakness, as the fall of Czarism would automatically entail the fall of the Orthodox Church – which, in fact, occurred in 1917.

From then onward the machinations of Vatican diplomacy were resumed with renewed vigor wherever Orthodoxy existed – in the Balkans, in Russia, in Northeast Europe, and, indeed, even in the Near East.

Catholic instruments used to hamper, undermine, boycott and subjugate the Orthodox Church have been extremely varied, ranging from converted White Russians to Turkish officers, beginning and ending with diplomatic or political intrigues of all kinds, as can easily be imagined.

A typical case occurred after the First World War, when the fortunes of war put the fate of Constantinople in the balance. Immediately following the outbreak of hostilities, Lloyd George, Zaharoff and Premier Venezelos of Greece, signed an agreement by which the Greeks were to get the former Orthodox capital, This provoked a storm of protest from various quarters. The strongest, however, did not come from any Western State, but from the Vatican. The British government, with whom the final decision rested, became the particular target of Papal displeasure. Constantinople should never be ceded to the Orthodox Church, was the Vatican’s request. This was tactfully ignored. Thereupon, Catholic diplomacy having looked elsewhere for support, soon found an unexpected ally in an unexpected quarter, a Turkish officer by the name of Kemal, who in no time dispelled Rome’s anxiety by a brilliant victory at Smyrna. Kemal’s victory precluded any possibility of Greece getting the ancient Orthodox capital.

Kemal Ataturk was not slow to perceive that identification of the interests of the young Turkey and of the Vatican could be mutually beneficial, and a tacit but real alliance was unofficially agreed upon. The fruits that it bore were various. They ranged from the heavy punishment and even death of any Turkish soldier found harming Armenian Christians, to the granting of special privileges to the Catholic Church in Turkish territory. But in the eyes of Rome, its paramount result was that the Orthodox Church had been prevented from returning to its ancient seat.

As long as an independent Turkish nation existed, Constantinople, by remaining incorporated in it, would never pass to her, The new Turkish republic, therefore, must survive and prosper. Following this strategy, the curious spectacle of the Vatican supporting a Moslem nation ruled by an atheist dictator became a discreet feature of Catholic diplomacy. Kemal Pasha, in gratitude for the unofficial pressure exerted in his favor by Catholic diplomacy in many European quarters, maintained a tacit understanding with the Vatican throughout his tenure of office; an alliance, this, which, although almost unnoticed, yet more than once stultified various conflicting interests in the Middle East.

Kemal Ataturk, who had been the instrument of “a great victory for the Pope,” as the Osservatore Romano triumphantly put it, commenting upon Kemal’s military victory at Smyrna, a decade or so later became the instrument of a second, which symbolically was even more significant.

The center of the Orthodox Church since the foundation of the Byzantine Empire of Constantine the Great in A.D, 324 has been the great Church of St. Sophia, which for over a millennium had come to symbolize Orthodoxy perhaps even more than St. Peter’s in Rome symbolizes the Mother Church of Catholicism. From St. Sophia the Orthodox Patriarchs ruled almost like Popes of the East, until the fall of Constantinople. After the fall, notwithstanding the shifting of the center of Orthodoxy, St. Sophia continued to be the greatest symbol of Orthodoxy: a link bridging her past with the present, and her present with a future when St. Sophia would become once more the Mother Church of all Orthodox the world over.

Such a dream, however, was soon to be shattered, at least for a comparatively short period, when in 1935 Kemal, in one of his boldest steps to modernize Turkey, converted St. Sophia into a museum of Romano-Byzantine-Christian and Ottoman-Muslim art. The humiliation of the center of Orthodoxy could not have been more bitter.

A thing worthy of notice is that, prior to Ataturk’s decision, the Vatican was informally consulted about any possible objections to St. Sophia’s transformation. The Vatican, which thunders so promptly whenever a nation threatens to secularize Catholic schools or churches, not only did not object, but actually tacitly approved and even encouraged Kemal in his scheme.

It was thus that, when finally the muezzin, having climbed the minarets of St. Sophia, called in echoing accents to the faithful for the last time and the great building became officially a museum, whereas in the East the Moslems exculpated themselves to Allah for the sacrilege and the Orthodox world heard of the change with a heavy heart, at the Vatican there were smiles. Enigmatic, it is true, but very clear to those who understood the secret code of diplomacy.

If the first upheaval created by the First World War had enabled the Vatican to score a significant victory against the Orthodox Church, that same world had unexpectedly opened up a tremendous vista of conquests for Catholic diplomacy by causing the simultaneous thunderous fall of two great empires which until then had partially dominated both the East and the West alike – i.e. the Turkish and the Russian empires. This meant not only the tumbling of two massive political units, but also – and for the Vatican this had an even more significant meaning – the tumbling of the caliphate as the supreme head of Islam, and of the czar as the supreme head of the Orthodox Church.

The downfall of czarism, in addition to being a political event of the first magnitude, spelled the disintegration of the power of the Orthodox Church, centered in the person of the czar.

The centralization of political-religious power, by binding both, meant that the downfall of one would spell the downfall of the other. This is precisely what occurred. The Russian Revolution consequently, by sweeping away czarism, swept away also the established Orthodox Church. The latter fell, not only because of her ties with the civil power, but also owing to the intrinsic dead weight which she had grown within herself. The Orthodox Church, in fact, had become a formidable reactionary power in her own right, whose economic tentacles spread to every nook and cranny of Holy Russia, controlling with an iron grip the minds and bodies of its inhabitants. She had over 80,000 churches and chapels and an army of 120,000 priests, supplemented by thousands of monasteries and convents, inhabited by another 100,000 monks and nuns. She controlled enormous wealth in land and buildings, owning 20,000,000 acres of the richest land and, at the time of the outbreak of the revolution, a bank balance of eight billion rubles and an income of about 500,000,000 rubles a year.

Her influence was truly enormous and was at the service of the czar, whose absolutism was further advocated by priests who took to politics. Without mentioning the monk Rasputin, the clergy sent to Parliament were of the most reactionary kind. The Third Duma saw forty-five priests, none of whom belonged to the liberal party; the next Duma had forty-eight, forty of whom represented the most reactionary movements. Whenever there were elections, the Orthodox Church supported the czar and preached against any social or political reform.

The Bolshevik Revolution, when it came, swept away this formidable tool of reaction as ruthlessly as it did czarism. The immense church property was nationalized, schools were requisitioned, the clergy were brought to political impotence: in short, the separation of Church and State was made a reality, and the Orthodox Church, despoiled of her magnificence, was reduced overnight to the naked poverty of early Christendom.

All these portents were followed with sinister fascination by the Roman Curia. When, therefore, in 1917 the Bolsheviks took over, at the Vatican, incredible as it may seem, there was jubilation. If the Bolsheviks were a terrible menace, they were also a blessing in disguise. Had they not pulled down the Orthodox Church, Rome’s seemingly immovable rival? Had they not become the instruments for her approaching total disintegration?

The Russian Revolution had thus opened for the Vatican an immense field for Catholic conquest. A bold policy might result in what Catholicism had attempted in vain for over one thousand years: the reunion of the Orthodox Church, via a mass conversion of the Russians, in addition to the spiritual incorporation of Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia, the Polish Orthodox Ukrainians and all the other different Orthodox groups in Eastern Europe – in fact, practically the whole Orthodox world. Orthodox resistance against the Soviets found no sympathy whatsoever in Rome. On the contrary, it was welcomed in the hope that, by defying the new atheistic government, the Church would be given a mortal blow and would be wiped out for good.

It was while waiting for the Orthodox Church to receive the last blow that would finally bury her, and while the whole of Europe kept repeating, “This Lenin cannot last” – and by Lenin was meant Bolshevik Russia – that the Vatican unobtrusively made the first moves directed at attaining simultaneously its two main goals: acceleration of the stab in the back for what it believed to be an already moribund Orthodox Church, and its grandiose scheme for the mass conversion to Catholicism of the Orthodox millions.

Count Sforza, a leading figure in the Italian Foreign Office was approached by Pope Benedict XV, via one of the Popes most intimate confidants, and, under the seal of secrecy, was asked whether he would facilitate the entry of a number of Catholic priests into Russia. “Seeing my surprise,” Count Sforza afterward related:

Monti (the Pope’s confidant) explained, and it was evident that he was repeating the very words of the Pope: “His Holiness thinks that even these crimes and this blood will one day be of service if it is going to be possible, when the wave of irreligion has passed, to attempt a Catholic evangelization in Russia. Orthodoxy no longer has any deep rooted life; its end as the official religion offers possibilities which would never have existed so long as a Czar, Protector of the Church, continued to reign.”1

On receiving a favorable reply, on the orders of Benedict XV, “young priests began desperately studying Russian and the history of the Orthodox Church.”1 Catholics with Russian experience and Catholic Russians overnight became top counsellors, chief among these being a Russian diplomat who, besides having become converted to Catholicism, had been ordained a Catholic priest: Alexander Evreinow, who was often consulted by the leading figures of the Vatican Secretariat of State.

From Rome, Vatican activities spread toward Russia itself. Negotiations between Rome and Moscow continued with varying fortune, the Bolsheviks being seemingly bent on pursuing crafty tactics. Yet at the Vatican the hopes that its patient efforts would eventually be rewarded by the conversion of “a country of 90,000,000 people to the true religion” remained very bright. “The moment has arrived propitious for rapprochement” (between the Vatican and Moscow),

–wrote the Osservatore Romano, “inasmuch as the iron circle of Caesaro-popism, which hermetically closed Russian religious life to all Roman influences, has been broken.”

At this point one question might come to the fore, in view of subsequent events. Surely Vatican diplomacy could not possibly trust the promises of the Bolsheviks? And, if so, why did it go on negotiating? The answer is simple, the transactions were useful as preparatory ground for the eventual grand-scale conversion of Russia after Bolshevik Russia had collapsed.

For the key to Vatican diplomacy, then as now, was just this. It must be remembered that at that period expeditionary forces were being dispatched by various Western countries to kill the revolution; indeed, that Catholic Poland had invaded Russian territory, and that anti-Bolshevik armies, encouraged, sponsored and supported by the West, were roaming inside and outside Bolshevik Russia, in attempts to bring about its early downfall. The Chancelleries of Europe were buzzing with plans and counter-plans of all kinds to bring nearer the blessed day.

The Vatican, consequently, based its moves on a possibility which at this period was practically a certainty for diplomatic Europe” Actual political conditions [inside Russia] form a grave obstacle; but this obstacle,” pontificated again the Osservatore Romano, “has a temporary character.”

The climax of the Vatican-Bolshevik negotiations were reached in 1922, when the Conference of Genoa offered the most incredible spectacle of the Bolshevik Foreign Minister, Chicherin, and the Pope’s representative, the Archbishop of Genoa, toasting one another in public. Vatican diplomacy thought it had scored a triumph, or, at least, was about to score one. Chicherin’s “concessions,” however, were but an amplification of the basic Soviet rule that, as the separation of Church and State was an accomplished fact, there was the amplest scope for any Church zealous of proselytizing. The Vatican, whose scheme remained immense, interpreted this as favorable to itself, and plans for the “Catholicizing of Russia” were put forward. These, however, soon incurred great difficulties, owing to the delaying Soviet tactics.

But what gave Vatican diplomacy a shock, and its understanding with the Soviets a matter of urgency, was that the Bolsheviks, giving a literal interpretation to their constitution, had applied religious freedom with equal impartiality to various Protestant bodies, which had meanwhile made soundings for the Protestant evangelization of the Russians. This was not all. Atheistic and anti-religious organizations of all kinds were also flourishing everywhere, sponsored by the State itself. But, still worse, the moribund Orthodox Church, instead of resignedly giving up the ghost, was still alive – indeed, was giving alarming signs of recovering.

The incursion of the Protestants into what the Vatican had envisaged as its exclusive field, but, above all, the ominous recovery of the Orthodox Church, convinced it that time was pressing. Vagueness had to be replaced by concrete action, to force the hand of the Soviets.

The Vatican changed its tactics. The phase of patient, secretive negotiations was over. That of the diplomatic mailed fist was initiated. This consisted of indirect pressure, via Catholic friendly or allied nations, upon whomsoever Vatican diplomacy decided to attack.

A Papal messenger arrived at the Genoa Conference. He bore a missive whose content was simple. It asked the powers not to sign any treaty whatsoever with Bolshevik Russia unless “freedom to practice any religion” was guaranteed. Freedom, the Vatican explained to the Soviet representative at this juncture, meant complete freedom “for the Catholic Church.” With regard to the other Christian denominations (Protestant and Orthodox), the Vatican would not object to any “restrictive” measures that the Soviets might take against their exertions. Previous to this, the Vatican had made sure of the support of some of the countries participating in the Conference by discreetly “briefing” Catholic and anti-communist representatives assembled there.

The Vatican’s efforts ended in nothing, the Genoa Conference having failed.

In 1927 the last semi-direct attempts at agreement between the Vatican and Moscow took place. The Vatican declared its dissatisfaction with “the Soviet proposals,” and relations with Moscow were broken off for good.

Something of paramount importance which, more than anything else, made the Vatican adopt another diplomatic policy had meanwhile occurred.

The Orthodox Church, although still stunned by the 1917 blow, had rapidly adapted herself to the changed situation. The separation of Church and State, which the Vatican had reckoned would kill her, had turned out to be a more invigorating factor than her former identification with the government which had caused her downfall. Orthodoxy, in fact, had begun to reorganize itself, and in the religious domain had already almost recovered its former strength.

In these conditions, the original grandiose scheme of the Vatican had become obsolete. The policy of conversion was therefore discarded and a new one adopted. This rested upon the forcible overthrow of Soviet Russia via military attack.

The original plan, based upon the formula that the Soviet regime was of a “temporary character,” was re-adopted. The various Foreign Offices of the world were still conceiving different schemes for the overthrow of the Bolsheviks. Had these succeeded, the Catholic Church would have penetrated Russia in their wake.

It became increasingly evident, however, that to base a whole strategy upon this kind of “intervention” was to pursue an increasingly unrealistic policy. And within a few years, although the plan was once more discreetly dropped, it was nonetheless promptly replaced by another, no less grandiose: the total mobilization of the West against Soviet Russia, to be carried out, no longer by direct military intervention, but by an ideological and emotional anti-Bolshevik crusade, preparatory to an eventual physical attack.

The scheme soon became a reality, thanks to the timely growth of a most sinister political portent: fascism, whose fundamental policy was war against communism. The Vatican, which had already concluded an alliance with its original founder, supported similar movements everywhere it could, with a view of converting the whole of Europe into a monolithic anti-Bolshevik bloc. Its ultimate objective: a military invasion of Russia.

By 1930-31 the West had already been “emotionally roused to war against godless Russia.” Only three years afterward, Hitler, having come to power, began to voice his ambition of acquiring the Ukraine; three more years, and the Anti-Comintem Pact was signed between Nazi Germany and Japan (1936). Russia was being swiftly enclosed in an iron ring, from the West and from the East. Two more years, and the first surrender of Europe to Hitler was made at Munich (1938), when the four powers – two fascist dictatorships, Nazi Germany and fascist Italy, on the one side, and two democracies, England and France, on the other – tried to settle the fate of Europe by sacrificing Czechoslovakia at the altar of appeasement. It was the Vatican which, during this crisis, specifically asked the British Premier, Chamberlain, to exclude Russia from the Conference. This at a time when Great Britain was seeking a pact with Russia, to strengthen her bargaining weight against Hitler. The exclusion proved fatal. Hitler emerged wholly victorious, and the Second World War was made inevitable.

In the following year Hitler occupied the whole of Czechoslovakia. During the Finnish War of 1939, Great Britain and France, with the Vatican in the background, instigated the expulsion of Soviet Russia from the League of Nations, and, in close cooperation with the Vatican, mobilized world opinion against her, speaking of this campaign as a crusade.

Two years later the Vatican’s grand strategy bore its fruit. Hitler, backed by the might of a nazified European continent, attacked Soviet Russia. The grandiose vistas dreamed of at the fall of the czar were dreamed of once more, to the chanting of hallelujahs in St. Peter’s. The Institute Pro Russia, in Rome, which had been languishing for so long, now pulsated with feverish activity,2 and Catholics were urged to renew their devotions to Our Lady of Fatima. Yes, the promise of the Virgin, so curiously in harmony with the Vatican’s grand scheme, at long last was coming true.

Within a few months, the Nazi armies had reached the outskirts of Moscow, Leningrad and Stalingrad. Soviet Russia was about to be destroyed.

The Nazi armies and the Catholic legions fighting by their side, after their initial triumph, were hammered back. And ultimately, to the horror of the Vatican, it was the Russians who entered Berlin and not Hitler who entered Moscow.

Vatican diplomacy had received yet another resounding defeat. But even before this had been completed, with its typical suppleness it had already launched yet another anti-Bolshevik, anti-Orthodox grand scheme, in cooperation with a new partner, which was even more powerful than its former Nazi ally – i.e. the United States of America. The new campaign had been launched while the guns of the Second World War were still echoing in the battlefields of both SEurope and Asia, and the people of the world were looking forward with a prayer in their hearts to an era of tranquility and peace,

As, after the First World War, Vatican diplomacy operated simultaneously a many-branched anti-Soviet strategy, so, after the Second, it launched another, no less formidable than the first.

The ultimate objective being the same, fundamentally its policy remained the same. In addition to its new main partners, playing the role of Nazi Germany vis-a-vis Soviet Russia, new tactical moves directed at implementing it were carefully studied and carried out. These, although seemingly disconnected, in reality were closely knit into an inter-continental pattern embracing the whole world.

The principal tactical features of this new strategy took the form of: (a) mobilization of the Catholics of the Near East; (b) mobilization of the Orthodox Church outside Russia; (c) mobilization of Islam; and (d) general intensification and speeding up of the ideological and military mobilization of the West.

These four types of political machination were carried out almost simultaneously, with a technique which was greatly different from that used after the First World War, when the Vatican, having failed to carry on its intrigues against the Orthodox Church inside Russia, had shifted its operations against her outside Russia – that is to say, in the Balkans.

After the Second World War the Vatican began to mobilize all Catholics in the Near and Middle East.

It was thus that, as the various Balkan countries became sealed to Catholic diplomacy, the Vatican became increasingly active outside the Balkans – e.g. with the Chaldean Catholics, mainly centered in Iraq; the Maronites in Lebanon; the Copt-Catholics in Egypt; the Melkites, or Greek Catholics, and others to be found in practically all these territories, as well as in Syria, Trans-Jordan and Palestine.

Simultaneously with this, it approached the Orthodox Church outside the communist world with a view to inducing it to side with the Vatican, or, at least, with the Vatican’s political allies in their anti-Russian, anti-communist wars.

Unofficial negotiations were initiated, but, owing mainly to Orthodoxy’s deep-rooted suspicion of the Vatican, these yielded very little result. Indeed, it looked as though they would prevent any real rapprochement altogether.

Vatican diplomacy waited for a while and then resorted to a master move. It sent to the Middle East, no longer Catholic diplomats, but the envoy of the two most powerful men in the West: Mr. Myron Taylor, the representative of the President of the U.S.A., and simultaneously, on this particular mission, representative of the Pope vis-a-vis the Orthodox leaders whom he went to meet.

It was thus that, at the beginning of February, 1949, when the cold war against Russia was at its height Myron Taylor arrived in Istanbul, where, in his dual capacity, he met the Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagorar.

Mr. Taylor put forward concrete plans for the cooperation of the Orthodox and Catholic Churches, in the face of the “communist threat to religion,” at the same time trying to ascertain the “true” current status of the Orthodox churches in communist-dominated countries, and the ways in which communism might be using these churches to strengthen its position in Eastern Europe and in Near East areas. Having discussed such matters, both with the Orthodox leaders and with the Apostolic delegate in Turkey, Myron Taylor, to make his argument for Orthodox cooperation more convincing, stated in no doubtful terms that the “cooperation” of Orthodoxy was not only wished for by the Vatican but was “wanted” by the U.S.A. The whole point of the Vatican’s choice of Myron Taylor, the representative of the American President, to meet the Eastern Orthodox leaders, was to lay emphasis precisely on this.

It was the trump card of Vatican diplomacy, so well screened behind the American envoy. For it must be remembered that Greece, where the Orthodox Church was at its strongest, had been saved by America from becoming a communist country only a short while before. Following the end of the Second World War, a bloody civil war between Right and Left devastated Greece for several years. Great Britain poured in troops to reinforce the anti-communist faction. The left, however, owing chiefly to the support of the population, was near to winning, and the U.S.A. had to intervene.

Military and financial aid was rushed to the country. The left was defeated. Extreme right-wing forces were installed in power. Throughout the civil war and the British and American intervention, the Orthodox Church played a paramount role. Indeed, at one time the Greek Orthodox Patriarch became head of the Greek government.

The Orthodox Church, having identified itself with the right and with the American interventionists, consequently had the support of the Greek government, sponsored by the U.S.A. Withdrawal of American protection would have meant the fall of the right-wing Greek government, in which case the fate of the Greek Orthodox Church would have been precisely a repetition in miniature of the fate of the Russian Orthodox Church on the fall of the czar.

The dispatch of the American envoy as the Vatican’s representative, with his emphasis on the American desire to see the cooperation of the Orthodox Church, was political blackmail of the first order which the Vatican had accomplished by using political, non-Catholic pressure.

Precisely one year later the mission bore its first real fruit. In February, 1950, His Beatitude the Patriarch Cristoforos of Alexandria arrived in Athens to prepare with Archbishop Spiridon, head of the Orthodox Church in Greece, for an event of the greatest significance: the summoning of a Pan-Orthodox Synod.

The new Synod, once translated into less directly theological terms, meant a political council of the Orthodox churches to keep step with the anti-communist war of their protector, the U.S.A.

The Orthodox Church within the communist region countered soon afterward, when Patriarch Alexei of Moscow “extended” the Russian Church’s jurisdiction to include Hungary (March, 1950).

This was followed by a counter-blow from the Russian Orthodox Church in the United States, which announced that it had officially broken all ties with the Orthodox Church of Moscow. Metropolitan Bishop Krimowicz, of Springfleld, Mass., was appointed Patriarch of the Orthodox Church in the United States, and Metropolitan Bishop Jaroshevich Patriarch of the Orthodox Church in foreign countries (October, 1950). In December, 1951, Metropolitan Leonty, the Orthodox Church’s U.S. Primate, and the Bishops of Alaska and San Francisco, invested a one-time officer of the czarist army as the first Orthodox Bishop of Washington. 3

Moves and counter-moves followed one another in quick succession in the years that followed, until the bridges were totally burnt on either side.

The Orthodox Church had been split asunder, one part, the larger, in Soviet Russia, the center of the communist world, the other in the U.S.A., the center of Western capitalism.

Division means weakness. The Vatican had maneuvered its opponent where it had planned to maneuver it, in readiness for reducing further its unity and thus bringing nearer its ultimate downfall.

Simultaneously with these moves, Vatican diplomacy was busy setting in motion one of the greatest religious-political forces in the world, Islam. Islam, the historic enemy of Christianity, had always loomed large in the Vatican diplomatic plans against the Orthodox Church.

Cautious unofficial exchanges between the Vatican and various Arab countries, particularly the most influential Islamic country in the Middle East, Egypt, were begun in the years that followed the Second World War. These bore exceptional results. In 1946 an Arab delegation, composed of Christians and Moslems, paid an official visit to the Pope, and in 1947 the Moslem East made its first official approach to the Vatican. Egypt exchanged representatives with the Pope, and sent to Rome a Minister Plenipotentiary. Other Moslem countries – e.g. Syria, Lebanon, Iran – followed Egypt’s example, and soon even those Moslem lands which had not yet officially exchanged diplomats were unofficially in close touch with Rome.

The Vatican’s mobilization of the Islamic world culminated in 1950, when the Egyptian Foreign Minister, Salah ed Din, disclosed that Egypt and the Vatican had been conducting secret negotiations and had agreed upon the establishment of a “united Roman Catholic-Moslem front against communism.” 4

The following year, Azzam Pasha, Secretary-General of the Arab League, went to Rome for a whole week, where he saw the Pope and other Vatican dignitaries: “The time has come for us to collaborate loyally, both as a nation and a religious entity, in the rebirth of a common patrimony,” he declared, speaking on Radio Rome, “and in . . . the creation of a united front between Islam and Christianity against communism.” 5

The foundations of a Catholic-Islamic partnership had been skillfully laid by Vatican diplomacy. From then onward, particularly during 1951-52, and in spite of many vicissitudes, it continued to be solidified, to the present day. Islam is a potentially formidable religious-political unit. Whoever succeeds in exerting even a partial influence upon it will wield a power capable of provoking political and social repercussions in many strategically important parts of the world. From Spanish and French Morocco to Egypt, Persia, Pakistan, Indonesia, indeed, to within the very Soviet Union itself, housing 25,000,000 Moslems, as well as within communist China, housing another 50,000,000.

The potentialities of the Moslem world as a formidable anticommunist, anti-Russian, religious-political instrument, did not escape the attention of another anti-communist power, the U.S.A. The American mobilization of the Islamic countries had been initiated by Roosevelt himself, who, just before his death (1945), had envisaged meeting Ibn Saud of Saudi Arabia, King Farouk of Egypt and others, for the amalgamation of the Near and Middle East into the framework of American global foreign policy.

Since then, Vatican-American interests ran ever closer, until, within a few brief years, they were transformed into a veritable Vatican American alliance. The material might of the U.S.A. and the spiritual power of the Catholic Church, by mobilizing the religious influence of Islam and the political energies of the Arab world, had encircled Soviet Russia in a religious-political iron ring, the precursor of a military one.

It’s objective: for the U.S.A., the destruction of a mighty ideological and economic enemy; for the Catholic Church, the destruction, not only of communism, but of Soviet Russia, the new protector of her religious rival, the Orthodox Church.

In bygone centuries the Vatican schemed stubbornly and tirelessly with the Turkish Empire, with the Austrian Empire, with Moslem, Buddhist and other potentates, to bring about the downfall of czarist Russia, so as to weaken the Orthodox Church.

In the twentieth century it schemed with equal pertinacity with the Europe which arose after the First World War, with fascism and nazism before and during the Second, in order, by causing the downfall of Soviet Russia, to paralyze a regenerated Orthodoxy.

After the Second World War it continued in its relentless scheming with the U.S.A., with a “dollarized” Europe, with the Arab nations and other Asiatic countries, to annihilate the U.S.S.R., in order, once again, to subjugate its Orthodox rival.

Following the changed political world habitat, the Vatican renewed its attempts by wooing the Orthodox Church with plans of “Dialogues,” initiated by Pope John XXIII – a policy of blandishment instead of the old one of intrigues. The new policy soon yielded unusual dividends. Relics were returned, e.g. the skull of St. Andrew, which had rested in St. Peter’s, Rome, since 1462, sent back in 1964 by Pope Paul VI, to its original place, Patras, following the request by the Orthodox Metropolitan of Patras to Pope John XXIII the previous year.

Cordial relations with the traditionally morose orthodoxy were established. With the result that even the world’s largest orthodox body, the Patriarchate of Moscow, finally agreed to convoke a Pan Orthodox Conference to discuss “a dialogue” on equal terms with Rome.

This was preceded by an unique meeting: that of Patriarch Athenagoras of Constantinople with Pope Paul VI in Jerusalem (January 1964), followed in 1965 by the elevation of several Cardinals of the oriental churches in communion with Rome.

That same year the 14 orthodox churches participating in the Pan-Orthodox Conference at Rhodes sent a delegation to Rome, to establish the first formal contact with the Vatican since one of the last Union attempts in 1439.

The “dialogue” continued after the Second Vatican Council was over. And, although formal progress was made, the profound rivalry between the two Churches remained. The Orthodox Church’s main basic fear of ultimate absorption by Rome being still the major obstacle bedeviling their relationship.

Catholic scheming, it should never be forgotten, has for its ultimate objective, not only the annihilation of an ideological enemy, represented by Soviet Russia, but also the annihilation of a religious foe, which the Catholic Church is more determined than ever to reduce to total subjugation and, indeed, to wipe from the face of the earth: the ever-resurgent Orthodox Church, the millenarian enemy she has sworn either wholly to absorb or wholly to demolish and destroy.


1. See Count Sforza’s Contemporary Italy, F. Mulker, 1940.

2. The Vatican had known of Hitler’s Russian invasion before the invasion took place. See Chief of intelligence, J. Colvin, 1951.

3. Third week of December, 1951 – the Very Reverend Archimandrite Jonah.

4. Cairo, January 31, 1950. Mohammed Taber al Omari Bey, the Egyptian Minister to the Vatican, confirmed this. The report was denied by the Osservatore Romano, which called it “fantastic” (April 28, 1950).

5. January 12, 1951. Universe.


Manhattan, Avro. Vatican Imperialism in the 20th Century. Zondervan Publishers, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1965.


Further elaboration


Below see and excerpt from Avro Manhattan’s THE VATICAN AGAINST THE ORTHODOX CHURCH taken from The Millenium Report (UPDATED)





The Battle Is Raging Which Will Decide The Vicar Of Christ On Earth-The Orthodox Patriarchate of Moscow In Opposition To The Vatican Prelate Of Rome


The Illegitimate Rothschild Family Tree Killed Hundreds Of Millions (Stalin-Hitler and Mao All Rothschilds-Stalin’s Mother Impregnated In A Laundry room)

Baron Edmond de Rothschild loved to travel overseas on the family
yacht. From France to the Caucasus, the yacht stopped on the shores
of the Black Sea, then he travelled by land in his palanquin across the
Republic of Georgia, resting up with the wealthy Georgian-Jewish wine
merchant Prince Yakov Egnatashvili. Edmond was a well-known wine
connoisseur and his family owned the world’s finest vineyards and only
wanted to expand.

Bored, but happy with his sailing; exhausted by his land travels, but
elated by his stylish arrival; Baron Edmond de Rothschild got drunk with
his business associate, spilt wine all over his shirt and went down to the
laundry. The disillusioned wife of a cobbler, with two dead sons, Katerine
Dzhugashvili (22) helped Edmond (32) off with his shirt and the two
conceived a child on top of the warm copper one winter’s evening. This
“sensual and sensitive opportunism” may then have became a pattern for
the entire time Baron Edmond was at Prince Yakov Egnatashvili’s estate.

A child was conceived – the God-sent third son – and named Iosef
Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili, with the nickname ‘Soso’. By the time
Stalin turned six, his father began to notice a lack of resemblance and
took to the drink. They moved nine times in ten years, his business went
downhill, and he moved away from the family when Stalin was 12.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

German Right-Wing Party Wants to Arm Citizens Amid Security Concerns-Kremlin Wants Access To Incirlik Airbase-Germans Told To Stock Food And Water


Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) party wants the government to relax gun laws to allow citizens to protect their lives amid rising security concerns, its chairwoman told local media Saturday.

MOSCOW (Sputnik) — The government has been making moves to end illegal arms sales amid reports that the Munich gunman, who killed nine people at the shopping mall last month, had bought a pistol and ammo via such website.

“Many citizens feel less and less safe. Every law-abiding citizen must be able to defend themselves, their family and friends,” AfD’s Frauke Petry told the German newspaper Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung.

Petry accused the government of making devastating cuts to police funding and jobs, which increased their response times and left people vulnerable.

At the same time the federal authorities have been tearing down border controls, she said, leading to an upsurge in cross-border criminality.

“The AfD is the only party in Germany that opposes stricter gun laws. This will hit honest citizens and not those who buy guns on darknet.”

The darknet refers to Internet websites where people can exchange currency anonymously. This makes these networks more appealing to criminals, including drug and gun traffickers.


Anonymous Takes 9 Central Banks Offline — Unleashes Massive Assault on ‘Global Banking Cartel’

After a global call to arms, the Anonymous campaign against the global banking industry, OpIcarus seems to be gaining major momentum, as eight more financial institutions have been taken down after the initial attack on the Central Bank of Greece – followed by a similar DDoS attack on the Central Bank of Cyprus.

According to a video released in conjunction with OpIcarus, the attack on Bank of Greece marked the beginning of a “30-day campaign against central bank sites across the world.” This massive push, according to the video, aims to “strike at the heart of [the] empire by once again throw[ing] a wrench into the machine.”

In some of the most recent attacks over the weekend, hackers reportedly targeted the Central Bank of the Dominican Republic, the Dutch Central Bank, the Central Bank of Maldives, and Guernsey Financial Services Commission, according to the official @OpIcarus Twitter account.


Could this be the reason?

Anonymous Takes 9 Central Banks Offline — Unleashes Massive Assault on ‘Global Banking Cartel’

After a global call to arms, the Anonymous campaign against the global banking industry, OpIcarus seems to be gaining major momentum, as eight more financial institutions have been taken down after the initial attack on the Central Bank of Greece – followed by a similar DDoS attack on the Central Bank of Cyprus.

According to a video released in conjunction with OpIcarus, the attack on Bank of Greece marked the beginning of a “30-day campaign against central bank sites across the world.” This massive push, according to the video, aims to “strike at the heart of [the] empire by once again throw[ing] a wrench into the machine.”

In some of the most recent attacks over the weekend, hackers reportedly targeted the Central Bank of the Dominican Republic, the Dutch Central Bank, the Central Bank of Maldives, and Guernsey Financial Services Commission, according to the official @OpIcarus Twitter account.


Kremlin Presses Turkey for Access to NATO’s Incirlik Air Base, Home to US Nukes


Russian officials have reached out to Ankara to request access to the American-built base as a convenient launch pad for airstrikes in the Syrian theater, but it remains to be seen whether such cooperation will roil NATO’s feathers.

Russia has called on Turkey to provide access to NATO’s Incirlik Air Base, the critical launch pad for US and coalition airstrikes in Syria, in a bid to expand the country’s influence in the Middle East and to further the goal of combatting radical jihadist groups, primarily Daesh and al-Nusra, that threaten peace and stability in Syria.

The base is home to at least 50 US B-61 nuclear warheads each carrying the potential destructive capacity of 100 times the Hiroshima bomb, a reality that led to heightened concern among American officials during, and in the wake of, the failed coup attempt of the Erdogan regime.

Sitting only 65 miles from the Syrian border, defense analysts, including the former White House arms control official under Bill Clinton, have cautioned that these weapons are not safe from the Daesh terrorist organization and other hostile elements who could conceivably breach the perimeter if Americans are left unaided by Turkish police forces.

That fear likely grew more elevated as Turkey has drifted towards Russia in the wake of the coup with senior officials, including the Turkish President himself, insinuating if not outright claiming that the United States played a hand in the failed attempt to overthrow the government and with a brewing diplomatic row developing between Washington and Ankara over the State Department’s refusal to clear the extradition of Fethullah Gulen, who has been alleged to have been the mastermind of the failed coup.

The brewing situation between the United States and Russia have opened the door for the reestablishment of relations between Moscow and Ankara including increased defense and strategic cooperation in Syria.

“It just remains to come to an agreement with Erdogan that we get the NATO base Incirlik as [our] primary airbase,” Senator Igor Morozov, a member of the upper house’s committee on international affairs said reports the British newspaper The Times. He explained that the development would enable the Russian air force to engage in “constant bombing” of Daesh and other jihadist groups to bring the conflict to a resolution faster.

“You’ll see, the next base will be Incirlik,” he told Izvestia after the Kremlin revealed this week that its bombers had started flying out of Iran to launch attack on Syria. “This will be one more victory for Putin.”

Another Senator, Viktor Ozerov, told RIA Novosti, “It’s not certain that Russia needs Incirlik, but such a decision would be seen as a real willingness on Turkey’s part to cooperate with Russia in the war against terrorism in Syria.”

ALERT: Germany Tells Public to STOCK UP ON FOOD & WATER… What Do They KNOW??


by Bix Weir, Road to Roota, SGT

Germany holds one the triggers to the collapse the system. They have had it since 2012. I talked about it when they held meetings about trying to get their gold back from the US Fed. Their power lies in pulling the derivative time bomb held at Deutsche Bank.

So when the German government tells their people to stock up on 10 days of food and water because of potential “terrorist strikes” my mind immediately goes to my BS Meter which says…HIGH!

2016 is one of the worst years for the globalist agenda in decades. Think about it: first Trump wrecked most of their US candidates, then Brexit tore the EU plutocrats a new orifice, and there’s still over 4 months left to go!

Every time that globalism has been defeated, it has been at the hands of nationalist and populist revolts among the “peasantry”, and another such defeat is now looming for them in Europe, and they know it! In today’s article I’ll tell you what will likely happen in their next defeat, and what’s more, I’ll give you the date on which it will occur.



Vatican Very Close To Ancient Goal Of German Destruction As Families Flee Merkel Dictatorship Seeking Asylum In Russia

The Battle Is Raging Which Will Decide The Vicar Of Christ On Earth-The Orthodox Patriarchate of Moscow In Opposition To The Vatican Prelate Of Rome


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Battle Is Raging Which Will Decide The Vicar Of Christ On Earth-The Orthodox Patriarchate of Moscow In Opposition To The Vatican Prelate










This struggle dates back long before Ivan The Terrible instructed a vatican contingent to return to Rome, he was the vicar of Christ on earth. Many wars have raged since, most times the reasons have been well hidden from the masses, very well hidden by subterfuge and sleight of hand. The vatican intends to hold sway over the nations, all of them. It is really just this simple.

Russia it seems has been eternally under attack by a vatican-centric Europe. Russia has fought many wars against the tartars, then there was Napoleon, the bolsheviks and then Hitler. Now there is the Ukraine.

Will Dmytro The Aryan Yarosh-Merkel’s Boy In The Ukraine Flee To Paraguay Also?

You see the vatican controls just about everything related to what we call the west.


Regardless of what one might think, the law books indicate the City of London owns the American colonies and always has. Likewise Britain is owned by the Vatican-IRS Is Not A Gov Agency-US Did Not Declare Independence From king George-SSA #s Issued Through IMF-There Are No US Employees As There Is No United States. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816) The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288) The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502) Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213) The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. (IRS Publication 620953-54)

The US Constitution Gave Legal Ownership And Control Of The United States To The London Crown Temple And It Is Not Taught In Public Schools Nor Institutes Of Higher Learning



Clinton-Kaine’ Trump-Pence And The Jesuits

Who are the jesuits?

An excellent resource documenting all the so called Jesuits who are really Jews turned Catholic, hence “crypto-Jews”, can be found at Jewish

The Jesuit Order in its founding was very much Jewish. All five of its founding members were Marrano Jews – Jews masquerading as Christians.

Ignatius Loyola – Founder of the Jesuit Order (Jewish), Alfonso Salmeron – Jewish, Alfonso Salmeron – Jewish, Diego Lainez – Jewish, Nicolas Bodadilla – Jewish,

Simao Rodriguez – Jewish


Pedophilia Shows Up In Another Thousand Points Of Light-2 Judges In Pennsylvania Convicted Of Selling Children To Prisons-Same State Where Sandusky Convicted Of Pedophilia At Penn State University In “Happy Valley” at “Beaver Stadium”-Coach Dies Just Before Trial And Two Prosecutors Murdered


The Treaty Of 1213 – The Beginning Of The Lie



Pope Pacelli-Ordained Saint Funnels 1000 Gold Bars To The Nazi Party-Stalin-Hitler-Himmler-Castro All Jesuits



The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization- not a religious order-Their chief is a general of an army-not the mere father abbot of a monastery



Russia And The Jews-First Time Ever Reviewed In The English Language-The Great Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s Banned Book On Russian-Jewish Relations And The Christian Holocaust



The Hidden Hand That Shaped History


Below see and excerpt from Avro Manhattan’s THE VATICAN AGAINST THE ORTHODOX CHURCH taken from The Millenium Report (UPDATED)






The Vatican against the Orthodox Church


Vatican’s Holocaust


Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster: A Terrorist Attack By The Usual Suspects


Who Is Running America?






Wake up or perish! Russian Philosopher Irene Caesar interviewed on NWO- Putin- WW3 and the solution






Cardinal Brienne And Napoleon Were Jewish

Lomenie de Brienne

The Illegitimate Rothschild Family Tree Killed Hundreds Of Millions (Stalin-Hitler and Mao All Rothschilds-Stalin’s Mother Impregnated In A Laundry room)


We are living in what is known as the information age. However there are always those who will try and deny, twist and obfuscate the obvious. They say the mark of a good intel person is to always deny deny deny. We find multiples across the web who will try and tell you that Hitler is some kind of hero. I am sure you have heard the barter system theory, put a chicken in every pot, gave Germany the volkswagon and built some roads routine.

There are many on the Russian side who will move heaven and earth to try and convince you that Stalin was a hero, he defeated nazism etc. No I am afraid not, both figures were simply fronts for rich industrialists to loot both countries. What will change the face of history and show  you have been duped is to understand that both Hitler and Stalin were Rothschilds. Yes both were jewish and Stalin was a jesuit priest. There is a lot of money riding on keeping this quiet. Billions in reparations are still being bled from the German people. Hitler has to remain a hero just as shills like Kaminski, Yeager, Topham, Spingola, Mike King and others will try and tell you. Below I am going to attempt to make it very clear to you they and many others are liars. Anyone who can’t figure this out reading the links below is probably going to need it tattooed on their forehead.

List of most evil crimes Type Year Crime Of publishing a false statement for the purpose of concealment of status: (1900 to present day) That the Catholic Church, more specifically the Jesuit Order has maintained countless false statements and documents pertaining to the status of Joseph Stalin. That Fr. Joseph Stalin S.J. was a trained, dedicated and fully ordained Catholic priest of the Jesuit order, who was recruited for a historic mission in his final year at the seminary in 1899. That in addition to failing to recognize Fr Joseph Stalin S. J. Furthermore, that the Jesuit Order did permit Fr Stalin to marry not once but twice, while remaining a fully ordained priest. That for his entire life until his death, there is no indication that Fr Joseph Stalin S. J. was ever defrocked as a priest. Of Murder (political assassination) (1924): That Jesuit Superior General Wlodimir Ledochowski did order Fr. Joseph Stalin S. murder the leader of Communist Russia on January 21, 1924, aged 53. That Fr. Stalin did act to protect his position and mission as General Secretary of the Communist Party upon the insistence of Lenin that he be removed. That not only did Stalin have Lenin poisioned, but that he did spread rumours upon his ascendancy to absolute power that Lenin has been mentally unwell for the last few years of his reign and had even died from Syphilis. Of one of the greatest crimes against humanity : (1939-1945) That the Catholic Church through its deliberate placement of key figures including loyal Catholics Mussolini, Hitler, Franco and Fr Stalin S,J. and through its financing of a second European arms race including the deliberate extension of the war is directly and ultimately responsible for the deaths of in excess of 63,000,000 people between 1939 and 1945. What is of supreme depravity and inhumanity is that this was done by an organization that maintains the façade of being a “good” religion headed by a position known as “his holiness”. Furthermore, that the Catholic Church did profit on this terrible act of evil. Of open contempt for church law for the purpose of promoting crimes against humanity : (1953 to present)

Full Text

Over the years others, as well as myself, have drawn a certain amount of skepticism for putting forward these ideas but now we see some Germans getting on board. We stand by everything I have posted. The policy may seem confusing but has not really changed. The goal was to ensure that no meaningful relationship would develop between Russia and Germany that would be a major road block on the way to the NWO (New World Order). Stalin and Hitler were both tools of the Tavistock Institute and designed to destroy both Germany and Russia with as little damage as possible to Rome and London. It worked very well. Now the goal is the same, Germany with their technology cannot befriend Russia with their military and vast resources. So we have mass immigration to Germany. No German technology to Russia, in fact no Germans, no problem. The Germans are to be bred out of existence through mass immigration and a European super state created with a population that knows no national identity. Yes Hitler was a Rothschild and Stalin was a Jesuit priest. The goal is the same, the technique and methodology only change. Some of this may sound familiar.

Russia and the USSR had their 911 that not many are familiar with.

The entire history of Saudi Arabia also is somewhat of a deep sordid affair.

We can say that Russia contains vast resources unknown to the general population also.

All of this did not just begin with Hitler either, it goes way back, even further than this. You see Napoleon was Jewish also and his uncle was a cardinal. We are in the final stages now and it could very well lead to world war three. It went into high gear just about here.

Germanic Tribes Destroy Three Roman Legions And Change History-Vatican Still Seeks Revenge-Rome Never Forgets; The Vatican Never Forgives



Ultra-secret Plot Behind Hillary Exposed: Yes, The Jesuits Will Be The Power Behind The Throne



Obama Surrounded By Intel Jesuits



The Roman Empire Still Alive And Well After All These Years




TOP 50

In fact Jerry Brown is a jesuit

Gov. Jerry Brown

Crazy Jerry Brown Of California Is Going To Criminalize Adults Who Refuse Vaccinations-The State Is The 8th Largest GNP And A Major Agricultural Hub-Taking It Down Is Crucial To Agenda 21


Behind The Green Mask



Bulgarian Prophet Vanga Revealed A Message Similar To Cayce



Vanga predictions for 2016: ISIS conquers Europe, turns continent into wasteland


Voices From Joseph And The Greek Monastery-The Vatican Will Cease To Exist-Jewish Masons Will Force Turkey Into War With Greece And Russia Will Destroy Turkey


Elder Paisios Amazing Prophecies About Constantinople



Nostradamus Predicts The Rise Of An Islamic Empire And The Infernal Gods Of Hannibal-Never More Horror Nor Worse Of Days



Violence In Germany




angela merkel jew jewish

angela merkel white genocide anti white



Merkel Shouted Down As A Traitor In Germany

German Chancellor Angela Merkel Praises “Visions For 2050” A Book Predicting The Extinction Of The German People: Germany With Natural Born Killers At The Helm








All across the web you will see attacks on Vedantic history

Raising Kundalini

The oldest written records of man are dismissed out of hand.

Who Are The Nefilim, Where Did They Go, Will They Return?



Wars Between Gods And Men-Ancient Aliens-Sumerian Cuneiform Tablets And Mathematics


I am always amused when I see some moron on the net attempting degrade the Vedas

Vedanta: Stolen-What Is Truth?




The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan – The genocide of the Peoples of Europe (The Day The Luck Of The Irish Ran Out)



Yatsenyuk Flees To Argentina-Is Merkel The Girl From Bariloche Next? Beatrice von Storch Of The AfD Predicts Merkel Will Run To South America For Security Reasons Before The Fall Of Germany Once Again



Syria Will Fall To Rescue Mankind: Russia Releases More Vanga Prophecies



Bulgarian Psychic Vanga Predicts Nothing Will Be left But The Glory Of Vladimir, No Word If This Was Lenin Or Putin, Russia To Be The World’s Only Superpower



Vatican Very Close To Ancient Goal Of German Destruction As Families Flee Merkel Dictatorship Seeking Asylum In Russia



Cosmic Convergence: Why Was Jesuit Trained Tim Kaine Selected To Succeed Hillary?



The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan – The genocide of the Peoples of Europe (The Day The Luck Of The Irish Ran Out)



Pope Celebrates Easter Week by Washing Migrant Feet


Emotions In Italy Running High Against the EU As The Pope Calls For Chrislam-Say Boss Isn’t That Changing The Rules In The Middle Of The Game?



The House Of Saud: It’s Jewish Origin And Installation By The British Crown



It Is Time To Revisit The Prophecies Of Monks Joseph And Elder Paisios Who Predict Turkey Will Cease To Exist When They War On Greece As Russia Will Step In With Nuclear Weapons



Nostradamus Predicts The Rise Of An Islamic Empire And The Infernal Gods Of Hannibal-Never More Horror Nor Worse Of Days






A Few Dim Flickers Of Truth Beginning To Penetrate ‘The Mainstream Alternative News’ (Everybody’s Got Something To Hide Accept For Me And My Monkey)



All Roads Lead to Armageddon



The final result of the great game may not rest with the hand of man


All Hell (And Heaven) Breaks Loose In 2014 (The Kali Yuga Where Ignorance Becomes Bliss)



Prophecy of Bulgarian Mystic Peter Deunov Predicts Coming Superwave 39 Years Before the Superwave Theory Was First Proposed

Bulgarian mystic Peter Deunov

And we are told nothing unusual is happening

Bad News For The Climate Change Denial Industry



Inuit Elders Say Their Sky Has Changed And The Earth Has Tilted-BBC Inadvertently Shows Kalki Beside The Morning Sun-NASA Worried By Inuit Information



The World’s Most Dangerous Dams With Spectacular Possiblities From Our Planners Hovering Above Nuclear Plants



Large Earthquake of 6-7 Near Pelee Volcano On Martinique-Cayce Predicts This Eruption In Conjunction With Vesuvius Begins Rapid Earth Change


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment